Supreme Court Case Asks: How Much Do Partygoers Need To Know About The Party House?


The U.S. Supreme Court listened verbal arguments this week. We told we about one of a cases on a prior program. It was about a inherent plea to narrow-minded gerrymandering. But another box of seductiveness involves a rough celebration in Washington, D.C., and either a military could detain a 21 invited guest for trespassing. As NPR authorised affairs match Nina Totenberg reports, it seemed to elicit some engaging reactions from a justices.

NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE: This was no typical furious party. It enclosed strippers, booze, pot fume – yet no drugs were found – and a horde named Peaches, who released a invitation to her pals while she was evidently still in a routine of negotiating a terms of renting a place. The authorised problem is that when a cops arrived, they arrested everybody in sight, including one man they found in a closet.

They hauled 21 people down to a military hire and charged them all with trespassing since a military believed a residence was ostensible to be vacant. All charges were after dropped, though 16 of a 21 who had been arrested sued for fake detain and won. The city appealed. And during a Supreme Court, if a authorised questions were dry, a evidence was not. Justice Sonia Sotomayor started off skeptically.


SONIA SOTOMAYOR: Someone invites me into what they explain is their home or their place of living, we don’t ask to demeanour during their lease.

TOTENBERG: Lawyers for a District of Columbia pronounced dual of those who called to protest about a partiers pronounced a residence was ostensible to be vacant. And a cops pronounced that it looked that approach – frugally furnished and unequivocally dirty. But underneath serve questioning, they conceded a utilities were on, a fridge full and a bathrooms stocked. Justice Stephen Breyer followed a point.


STEPHEN BREYER: Today, younger people frequently say, hey, there’s a celebration during Joe’s (ph) house. And before we know it, 50 people go to Joe’s house. They don’t unequivocally ask themselves, does Joe possess a residence or lease a residence or something? It’s Joe’s house.

TOTENBERG: Justice Kagan picked adult a thread a bit wistfully.


ELENA KAGAN: When looked during from a reasonable partygoers’ view, there are these parties that once prolonged ago we used to be invited to…


KAGAN: …Where we didn’t – don’t know a host, though we know Joe is carrying a party. And can we contend that long, prolonged ago, pot was maybe benefaction during those parties? And, we know, it only is not apparent that a reasonable partygoer is ostensible to travel into this unit and say, got to get out of here. It seems a small bit tough that they’re theme to arrest.

TOTENBERG: There was, of course, most some-more to a argument, including a odds that a cops might during slightest win on procedural grounds. Nina Totenberg, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit a website terms of use and permissions pages during for serve information.

NPR transcripts are combined on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and constructed regulating a exclusive transcription routine grown with NPR. This content might not be in a final form and might be updated or revised in a future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The lawful record of NPR’s programming is a audio record.