Bowe Bergdahl Pleads Guilty To Desertion, Misconduct

Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl (right) was escorted into a troops building for a conference in Fort Bragg, N.C., on Monday.

Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl (right) was escorted into a troops building for a conference in Fort Bragg, N.C., on Monday.

Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

Updated during 11:45 a.m. ET

Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was hold by a Taliban after withdrawal his bottom in Afghanistan in 2009, has pleaded guilty to abandonment and misconduct before a enemy. Bergdahl was liberated in 2014 in sell for 5 Taliban detainees.

Bergdahl, a local of Idaho, pleaded guilty before a troops decider in a case, Army Col. Jeffery R. Nance, during a conference during Fort Bragg, N.C., on Monday, according to The Associated Press.

The AP adds, “It’s not transparent if Bergdahl, 31, has a understanding with prosecutors to extent his punishment, or if he’s simply pleading guilty in hopes of tolerance from Nance. The misconduct assign carries a limit chastisement of life in prison, while a abandonment assign is punishable by adult to 5 years.”

Questioned by Nance, Bergdahl said, “I left my regard post on my own,” CNN reports, adding that a infantryman also said, “I know withdrawal was opposite a law.”

The guilty defence comes some-more than dual years after a charges were filed. Earlier this year, Bergdahl’s lawyers pronounced their customer wouldn’t be means to get a satisfactory trial, citing dozens of comments about him that were done by President Trump dating to 2015.

Here’s a brief summation of a Bergdahl case:

  • June 2009: Bergdahl is restrained by a Taliban after withdrawal his bottom in southeastern Afghanistan. Almost immediately, questions arise about a resources of his capture
  • May 2014: Bergdahl is liberated in sell for 5 Taliban detainees who were being hold during a troops jail in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba
  • March 2015: The U.S. Army charges Bergdahl underneath dual sections of a Uniform Code of Military Justice: Article 85 (Desertion) and Article 99 (Misbehavior before a enemy)

During his captivity, Bergdahl was shown in several Taliban promotion videos; a mutinous organisation also filmed a sell that postulated his freedom, display a helicopter alighting and soldiers collecting Bergdahl before holding off again.

The restrained trade for Bergdahl delirious discuss — quite as Trump and others have variously pronounced that 5 or 6 soldiers died in a bid to locate and rescue a soldier.

Asked to explain that emanate in 2014, then-Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel pronounced in testimony before Congress:

“I have privately left behind and asked that doubt inside a Pentagon, in a Army, in all of a reports. we have seen no justification that directly links any American fight genocide to a rescue or anticipating or hunt of Sergeant Bergdahl. And we have asked a question. We have all asked a question. we have seen no evidence, no contribution presented to me when we asked that question.”

But while it seems no U.S. crew died in a bid to find Bergdahl, during slightest dual were bleeding — and Nance motionless over a summer that justification per those injuries should be considered. As Stars and Stripes reports, “The decider ruled that a Navy SEAL and an Army National Guard sergeant wouldn’t have wound adult in apart firefights that left them bleeding if they hadn’t been acid for Bergdahl.”

Legal questions about a box have extended over Bergdahl. In Aug 2014, a Government Accountability Office pronounced a Pentagon “didn’t give adequate notice to Congress and dissipated scarcely $1 million” in doing a restrained swap. In further to regulating income that was already appropriated for other uses, a Defense Department didn’t tell members of Congress about a barter until a day after it was made.

In response to those findings, a Pentagon pronounced it had to act fast to secure Bergdahl’s protected return; Hagel pronounced a resources were both unusual and unique.

Some of Bergdahl’s many finish comments about his knowledge came in a second deteriorate of a Serial podcast, that was published in late 2015. As NPR’s Eyder Peralta reported, Bergdahl pronounced “he left his post to try to stir debate in sequence to get a courtesy of tip troops officials so he could explain problems he saw in a Army.”

But he shortly satisfied it was a mistake — as Bergdahl pronounced on a podcast, “Suddenly, it unequivocally starts to penetrate in that we unequivocally did something bad. Or, not bad, though we unequivocally did something serious.”