Share

Another Federal Appeals Court Says Trump’s Travel Ban Should Remain On Hold

Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin speaks to media outward a 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Seattle, Washington, on May 15, 2017. The justice has mostly inspected a rough claim restraint President Trump’s transport anathema from going into effect.

Jason Redmond/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jason Redmond/AFP/Getty Images

Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin speaks to media outward a 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Seattle, Washington, on May 15, 2017. The justice has mostly inspected a rough claim restraint President Trump’s transport anathema from going into effect.

Jason Redmond/AFP/Getty Images

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a rough claim restraint President Trump’s transport anathema should sojourn in effect, during slightest for now.

Full Text: Trump's New Executive Order On Travel, Annotated

The preference centers on an executive sequence from a boss to temporarily postpone a acknowledgment of refugees and extent transport from some majority-Muslim countries. It’s Trump’s second try to levy such a policy; it has been blocked by lawsuits and never left into effect.

4th Circuit Court Ruling Keeps Trump's Travel Ban On Hold

The 9th Circuit says a transport anathema should sojourn dangling as a cases opposite it pierce by a courts. It’s a second such preference in reduction than a month: Weeks ago, a 4th Circuit released a identical ruling.

However, a 9th Circuit did sequence that one apportionment of a “travel ban” executive sequence — that does not extent transport or immigration, would call for inner reviews within a sovereign supervision — should be authorised to go into effect.

Both appeals courts were doubtful of a U.S. government’s evidence that a executive sequence was good within a president’s authority.

The White House has asked a U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a reduce courts and return a transport ban.